posted by
halialkers at 07:55pm on 07/05/2009
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Why were the Chinese able to rebuild their civilization and the West unable to do the same? I've always been puzzled that the Chinese went from Qin to Han and then after the Han imploded that a dynastic cycle could go into effect....but in the West, when Roman rule implodes, it does so permanently. In the West, the Roman Empire was never revived. In the East, the Ottomans continued to use the title after taking over the Byzantines, which in a way means the thing never really fell there. But in China, the dynasties really did fall and yet the Han people came back again and again to reconstruct their society from the ashes. Why were Qin Shi Huang's heirs able to reconstruct his ambitions, but Caesar Augustus's unable to do likewise?
There are 6 comments on this entry. (Reply.)